Is Warner Music Group (NASDAQ:WMG) Using Too Much Debt?

مجموعة وارنر ميوزيك +1.08%

Warner Music Group

WMG

28.15

+1.08%

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Warner Music Group Corp. (NASDAQ:WMG) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

How Much Debt Does Warner Music Group Carry?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2025 Warner Music Group had US$4.36b of debt, an increase on US$3.98b, over one year. On the flip side, it has US$527.0m in cash leading to net debt of about US$3.84b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:WMG Debt to Equity History September 30th 2025

How Strong Is Warner Music Group's Balance Sheet?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Warner Music Group had liabilities of US$4.05b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$4.92b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$527.0m and US$1.31b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$7.13b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Warner Music Group has a huge market capitalization of US$17.6b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Warner Music Group has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.9 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 6.1 times. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Sadly, Warner Music Group's EBIT actually dropped 8.7% in the last year. If earnings continue on that decline then managing that debt will be difficult like delivering hot soup on a unicycle. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Warner Music Group's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Warner Music Group recorded free cash flow worth 51% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

Our View

While Warner Music Group's net debt to EBITDA makes us cautious about it, its track record of (not) growing its EBIT is no better. But its not so bad at converting EBIT to free cash flow. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Warner Music Group is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

سيتم الرد على كل الأسئلة التي سألتها
امسح رمز الاستجابة السريعة للاتصال بنا
whatsapp
يمكنك التواصل معنا أيضا من خلال