Is Integer Holdings (ITGR) Fairly Valued Following Its Recent Share Price Gains?

Integer Holdings Corporation

Integer Holdings Corporation

ITGR

0.00

Recent Price Moves and Business Scale

Integer Holdings (ITGR) has attracted fresh attention after recent trading, with the stock last closing at $98.62. The company has a market value of around $3.3 billion and reports annual revenue of about $1.86 billion.

Recent trading has added to a run of stronger share price returns for Integer Holdings, with a 30 day share price return of 5.04% and a year to date gain of 28.44% even though the 1 year total shareholder return is down 8.80%.

If you are looking beyond Integer Holdings, this could be a useful moment to broaden your watchlist with companies in the 40 healthcare AI stocks.

Integer Holdings has scale, steady medical device demand and a share price that has pushed higher in recent months. The real test now is whether that solid business is still trading at an attractive valuation.

Most Popular Narrative: 1% Overvalued

The most followed narrative places Integer Holdings' fair value at $97.56, slightly below the last close at $98.62, which frames a fairly tight valuation gap.

Integer is experiencing robust demand growth, particularly in Cardio & Vascular and electrophysiology end markets, driven by increasing incidence of chronic diseases and the global demographic shift toward an aging population, this is leading to above-market sales growth with guidance for sustained organic revenue acceleration.

Behind that fair value sits a detailed blueprint that blends moderate revenue growth, firmer margins and a future earnings multiple that needs to hold up. Curious which assumptions carry the most weight and how much profit improvement is baked in.

Result: Fair Value of $97.56 (OVERVALUED)

However, Integer Holdings still faces potential setbacks if customer demand softens after recent inventory pull forwards, or if foreign exchange swings continue to weigh on reported earnings.

Another View on Integer Holdings Valuation

While the analyst narrative suggests Integer Holdings is about 1% overvalued around $97.56, the current P/E of 23.6x tells a different story. It sits far below peers at 76.6x and slightly above a fair ratio of 22x. This points to limited mispricing and still leaves a real question about upside versus downside skew.

For a closer look at what this gap between actual P/E, peers and the fair ratio could mean in practice, See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.

NYSE:ITGR P/E Ratio as at Jul 2026
NYSE:ITGR P/E Ratio as at Jul 2026

Next Steps

Given the mixed signals in the Integer Holdings story so far, this is a good moment to look at the full data set yourself and decide how the risk and reward trade off stacks up in your view, starting with 3 key rewards and 1 important warning sign

Looking for more investment ideas beyond Integer Holdings?

If Integer Holdings has sharpened your focus on valuation and risk, do not stop here. Use the Simply Wall Street Screener to surface fresh opportunities that match your style.

  • Target potential value opportunities early by scanning companies highlighted in the 50 high quality undervalued stocks.
  • Prioritize resilience in tougher markets by reviewing stocks identified in the 84 resilient stocks with low risk scores.
  • Hunt for lesser known prospects with strong fundamentals using the screener containing 20 high quality undiscovered gems.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.