Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Still Trades Below Fair Value While Earnings Look Pricier

ويلز فارغو آند كو

Wells Fargo & Company

WFC

0.00

Wells Fargo stock has delivered a very strong 122.1% return over the past three years, yet current valuation checks still point to the shares trading below an estimate of intrinsic value based on the Excess Returns model and on earnings multiples. With bank stocks drawing fresh attention as investors rotate from AI high flyers into financials, the question is how much of that intrinsic value gap is already being reflected in today’s US$85.94 share price.

  • Over the last three years Wells Fargo has returned 122.1%. This puts recent short term share price weakness into the context of a strong multi year recovery.
  • On the positive side, investor interest in bank stocks and the potential benefits to Wells Fargo from higher capital expenditure and efficiency gains may support cash flow expectations, while shifts in interest rate expectations and credit quality remain key risks to how those cash flows are valued.
  • The stock screens as undervalued on both the Excess Returns intrinsic value estimate and market multiples. However, the broader checks show a mixed picture, with Wells Fargo passing 4 of 6 valuation tests according to this value score of 4.

The issue now is whether Wells Fargo’s current discount to intrinsic value and earnings based measures still offers enough upside to compensate for the risks built into the outlook for the bank sector.

Does Wells Fargo Look Undervalued on Excess Returns?

The Excess Returns model looks at how efficiently Wells Fargo turns its equity base into profits above its cost of capital. For Wells Fargo, the key input is a stable EPS estimate of $8.25 per share on a book value base of $54.43 per share, with this earnings level sourced from forward Return on Equity estimates by 17 analysts.

That earnings power implies an average Return on Equity of 13.44% on a stable book value of $61.39 per share, compared with a cost of equity of $5.41 per share. The gap between the return generated and the required return, an excess return of $2.84 per share, feeds into an intrinsic value estimate of $116.95 per share. This level sits above the current $85.94 share price and points to a 26.5% discount. Recent rotation into bank stocks, as investors look beyond AI high flyers, helps explain why the gap has narrowed but still leaves Wells Fargo trading below what this model suggests its equity returns support.

On this Excess Returns view, Wells Fargo stock looks undervalued relative to its estimated intrinsic value.

Our Excess Returns analysis suggests Wells Fargo is undervalued by 26.5%. Track this in your watchlist or portfolio, or discover 52 more high quality undervalued stocks.

WFC Discounted Cash Flow as at Aug 2026
WFC Discounted Cash Flow as at Aug 2026

Is Wells Fargo Still Cheap on Earnings?

P/E is usually the cleanest way to compare banks, so it is a useful lens for Wells Fargo. The stock currently trades on a P/E of 12.0x, which is slightly above the Banks industry average of 11.8x, yet below the peer group average of 13.3x. That places Wells Fargo roughly in the middle of the pack on simple earnings pricing.

The Fair Ratio model, which looks at factors such as size, risk profile and sector, points to a P/E of 15.1x for Wells Fargo. Against this, the current 12.0x multiple implies the stock trades at a discount to what those characteristics might justify. Recent interest in bank stocks has moved valuations, but on these numbers Wells Fargo still prices below the level indicated by this more tailored P/E benchmark.

On the P/E multiple, Wells Fargo stock appears undervalued when compared with the Fair Ratio benchmark.

NYSE:WFC P/E Ratio as at Aug 2026
NYSE:WFC P/E Ratio as at Aug 2026

The Wells Fargo Narrative: What Would Justify Today's Price?

Simply Wall St Narratives for Wells Fargo pick up where the valuation checks leave off by spelling out what would need to happen to growth, margins and earnings for the stock to be worth materially more or less than today’s share price. Rather than relying on a single multiple or model point estimate, each Narrative lays out the underlying assumptions behind its fair value so you can compare them with Wells Fargo's actual results over time. These Narratives are available on Simply Wall St's Community page.

If you have a number driven view on whether Wells Fargo's position in the current rotation into bank stocks is justified, share a Narrative in the Simply Wall St community and spell out the assumptions behind your case.

It is a chance to add your voice on Wells Fargo's valuation, growth and risk profile today, and then see how your thesis holds up as new results and interest rate signals come through.

Do you think there's more to the story for Wells Fargo? Head over to our Community to see what others are saying!

The Bottom Line

For Wells Fargo, both the Excess Returns intrinsic value estimate and the earnings multiple work in the same direction and flag the stock as undervalued, even after recent interest in bank stocks. The broader valuation checks are mixed rather than overwhelmingly strong, which keeps the focus on whether that discount reflects opportunity or ongoing concern about sector risks such as interest rates and credit quality. The key question from here is whether investors continue to assign a cautious multiple to Wells Fargo or eventually close some of the gap that the intrinsic value and Fair Ratio P/E suggest.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.