Please use a PC Browser to access Register-Tadawul
After Intel (INTC), U.S. Wants a Piece of Micron (MU) & TSMC (TSM)
Micron Technology, Inc. MU | 397.58 | +2.18% |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR TSM | 327.37 | +0.38% |
Intel Corporation INTC | 54.32 | +0.13% |
PowerShares QQQ Trust,Series 1 QQQ | 620.76 | +0.73% |
ETF-S&P 500 SPY | 688.98 | +0.52% |
A new investment paradigm could be on the horizon for the semiconductor industry.
Investors should pay close attention as the U.S. government signals a major shift in its subsidy strategy. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is reportedly considering expanding an "equity-for-subsidy" program beyond Intel, with giants like Micron Technology, Inc.(MU.US), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Sponsored ADR(TSM.US), and Samsung now in the spotlight. This move could see the U.S. government take ownership stakes in these key chipmakers in exchange for federal funding, creating new risks and opportunities for shareholders.
The Core Idea: Swapping Subsidies for Shares
The "equity-for-subsidy" model is a novel approach tied to the CHIPS and Science Act. Instead of simply granting funds to support domestic manufacturing, the U.S. government is exploring taking non-voting equity stakes in the companies it subsidizes. The goal, as officials put it, is to generate a direct return for the American taxpayer on these massive public investments.
This strategy first made headlines with Intel Corporation(INTC.US). On August 19, Secretary Lutnick confirmed ongoing discussions to exchange CHIPS Act subsidies for a potential 10% stake in the company. While this would make the U.S. government Intel's largest shareholder, Lutnick was quick to clarify the government's role.
"This is not a governance issue; we are merely converting grants from the Biden administration into equity from the Trump administration to obtain returns for the American people, but this is without voting rights," he stated, emphasizing that the government would not seek board seats or influence over company management.
Why Investors Should Care: The Expansion
The story is no longer just about Intel. Following this precedent, the administration is now looking to apply the same logic to other major players building factories in the U.S. These include:
- Micron Technology: Awarded $6.2 billion in subsidies.
- Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC): Awarded $6.6 billion in subsidies.
- Samsung: Awarded $4.75 billion in subsidies.
With most of these funds yet to be disbursed, the government has significant leverage to negotiate for equity. This development was highlighted on August 20 by industry insiders, who noted that the administration is actively studying stake acquisitions in these firms.
The Trump Administration's Philosophy
This shift reflects a broader philosophy championed by the Trump administration to ensure the government gets a better deal. The approach was starkly articulated by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who criticized the previous administration's method.
"The Biden administration was essentially giving away money to Intel and Taiwan Semiconductor, providing these companies with funds for free," he commented. "Trump’s logic is, if you want money, fine, exchange it for equity. Why should we give so much money to a company valued at $100 billion?"
The White House has framed this as an "unprecedented innovative idea" that prioritizes American interests from both a national security and economic perspective.
This isn't an isolated tactic. Earlier this year, the administration approved Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel but insisted on the U.S. government holding a "golden share." This special share grants the government veto power over critical decisions like moving jobs overseas or closing factories, showcasing a clear trend towards greater government involvement in strategic industries.
For investors, this new "equity-for-subsidy" era means carefully watching how these negotiations unfold. While the infusion of capital is a positive, the prospect of government ownership—even without voting rights—introduces a new variable into the valuation and future strategy of these leading semiconductor companies.


