Please use a PC Browser to access Register-Tadawul
Health Check: How Prudently Does Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) Use Debt?
Vivid Seats Inc. Class A SEAT | 7.59 | +2.57% |
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Vivid Seats Inc. (NASDAQ:SEAT) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
When Is Debt A Problem?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
What Is Vivid Seats's Debt?
As you can see below, Vivid Seats had US$388.2m of debt, at September 2025, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$145.1m, its net debt is less, at about US$243.1m.
A Look At Vivid Seats' Liabilities
The latest balance sheet data shows that Vivid Seats had liabilities of US$348.2m due within a year, and liabilities of US$423.4m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$145.1m in cash and US$38.5m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$588.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
This deficit casts a shadow over the US$106.8m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Vivid Seats would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Vivid Seats's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward.
In the last year Vivid Seats had a loss before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 17%, to US$644m. That's not what we would hope to see.
Caveat Emptor
While Vivid Seats's falling revenue is about as heartwarming as a wet blanket, arguably its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is even less appealing. Indeed, it lost a very considerable US$36m at the EBIT level. If you consider the significant liabilities mentioned above, we are extremely wary of this investment. Of course, it may be able to improve its situation with a bit of luck and good execution. But we think that is unlikely, given it is low on liquid assets, and burned through US$30m in the last year. So we consider this a high risk stock and we wouldn't be at all surprised if the company asks shareholders for money before long. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.


