Please use a PC Browser to access Register-Tadawul
Is Traeger (NYSE:COOK) A Risky Investment?
Traeger COOK | 1.00 1.00 | +3.09% 0.00% Pre |
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Traeger, Inc. (NYSE:COOK) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
How Much Debt Does Traeger Carry?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Traeger had US$399.6m in debt in September 2025; about the same as the year before. However, it also had US$8.85m in cash, and so its net debt is US$390.7m.
A Look At Traeger's Liabilities
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Traeger had liabilities of US$73.0m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$430.5m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$8.85m in cash and US$80.7m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$414.0m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$126.0m company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Traeger would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Traeger can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
In the last year Traeger had a loss before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 2.7%, to US$583m. We would much prefer see growth.
Caveat Emptor
Over the last twelve months Traeger produced an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss. To be specific the EBIT loss came in at US$1.9m. Combining this information with the significant liabilities we already touched on makes us very hesitant about this stock, to say the least. That said, it is possible that the company will turn its fortunes around. But we think that is unlikely since it is low on liquid assets, and made a loss of US$105m in the last year. So while it's not wise to assume the company will fail, we do think it's risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 1 warning sign with Traeger , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.


