Analysts Are Updating Their Verastem, Inc. (NASDAQ:VSTM) Estimates After Its First-Quarter Results
Verastem, Inc. VSTM | 0.00 |
It's been a sad week for Verastem, Inc. (NASDAQ:VSTM), who've watched their investment drop 18% to US$4.89 in the week since the company reported its quarterly result. Revenues of US$19m missed forecasts by 13%, but at least statutory losses were much smaller than expected, with per-share losses of US$0.37 coming in 21% smaller than what the analysts had forecast. Earnings are an important time for investors, as they can track a company's performance, look at what the analysts are forecasting for next year, and see if there's been a change in sentiment towards the company. We thought readers would find it interesting to see the analysts latest (statutory) post-earnings forecasts for next year.
Taking into account the latest results, the current consensus from Verastem's nine analysts is for revenues of US$106.2m in 2026. This would reflect a substantial 114% increase on its revenue over the past 12 months. The loss per share is expected to greatly reduce in the near future, narrowing 28% to US$1.60. Before this earnings announcement, the analysts had been modelling revenues of US$114.9m and losses of US$1.71 per share in 2026. So there seems to have been a moderate uplift in analyst sentiment with the latest consensus release, given the upgrade to loss per share forecasts for this year.
There was no major change to the US$16.25average price target, suggesting that the adjustments to revenue and earnings are not expected to have a long-term impact on the business. Fixating on a single price target can be unwise though, since the consensus target is effectively the average of analyst price targets. As a result, some investors like to look at the range of estimates to see if there are any diverging opinions on the company's valuation. There are some variant perceptions on Verastem, with the most bullish analyst valuing it at US$18.00 and the most bearish at US$14.00 per share. Even so, with a relatively close grouping of estimates, it looks like the analysts are quite confident in their valuations, suggesting Verastem is an easy business to forecast or the the analysts are all using similar assumptions.
Another way we can view these estimates is in the context of the bigger picture, such as how the forecasts stack up against past performance, and whether forecasts are more or less bullish relative to other companies in the industry. For example, we noticed that Verastem's rate of growth is expected to accelerate meaningfully, with revenues forecast to exhibit 176% growth to the end of 2026 on an annualised basis. That is well above its historical decline of 20% a year over the past five years. By contrast, our data suggests that other companies (with analyst coverage) in the industry are forecast to see their revenue grow 22% per year. Not only are Verastem's revenues expected to improve, it seems that the analysts are also expecting it to grow faster than the wider industry.
The Bottom Line
The most important thing to take away is that the analysts reconfirmed their loss per share estimates for next year. Regrettably, they also downgraded their revenue estimates, but the latest forecasts still imply the business will grow faster than the wider industry. Even so, long term profitability is more important for the value creation process. There was no real change to the consensus price target, suggesting that the intrinsic value of the business has not undergone any major changes with the latest estimates.
With that said, the long-term trajectory of the company's earnings is a lot more important than next year. We have estimates - from multiple Verastem analysts - going out to 2028, and you can see them free on our platform here.
That said, it's still necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Verastem (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding these should be part of your investment process.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
