Curtiss-Wright (CW) shares slipped after the company reported quarterly revenue 5.1% above analyst expectations, with 13.4% year on year growth, higher operating margins, and a 23% increase in adjusted diluted EPS.

The earnings drop since the announcement comes after a strong recent run, with the share price up 32.3% year to date and a 1 year total shareholder return of 60%, pointing to positive but closely watched momentum around US$757 per share.

If this kind of strength in aerospace and defense has your attention, it could be a good moment to scan the wider field with the 34 power grid technology and infrastructure stocks

With Curtiss-Wright now near US$757 and only a small gap to the average analyst price target, the key question is simple: are you looking at an underappreciated compounder or a stock that already reflects years of future growth?

Most Popular Narrative: 6.4% Overvalued

The most followed valuation narrative puts Curtiss-Wright's fair value at about $711 per share, compared with the last close around $757, and anchors that view on long term contract and margin assumptions.

Record backlog growth (+12% YTD to $3.8B), strong book-to-bill ratios (1.2x in A&D), and a healthy order pipeline in both defense and nuclear align with management's confidence in posting 9 to 10% sales growth, 16 to 19% EPS growth, and over 100 bps of margin expansion in 2025, signaling undervaluation if current pricing underappreciates this forward visibility and operational leverage.

Curious what turns that backlog and margin story into a fair value near $711 instead of the current price? The narrative leans heavily on sustained earnings growth, rising profitability and a richer future earnings multiple. The exact mix of revenue assumptions, margin levels and discount rate could shift your own view sharply, depending on what you think is realistic.

Result: Fair Value of $711 (OVERVALUED)

However, that story can change quickly if large defense or nuclear contracts are delayed or cancelled, or if regulatory and competitive pressures squeeze margins harder than expected.

Another View: Market Ratios Paint A Different Picture

The earlier fair value of about $711 relies on detailed cash flow forecasts, but the market’s current P/E of 54.7x tells a different story. That multiple sits close to peer averages at 54.8x yet well above the US Aerospace & Defense industry at 37.5x and a fair ratio of 29.5x, which points to a meaningful valuation premium. The question is whether you think Curtiss-Wright has the staying power to justify that kind of gap.

For a closer look at how these ratio signals compare with earnings quality and sector peers, See what the numbers say about this price — find out in our valuation breakdown.

Next Steps

With all this in mind, do you feel the market is being too cautious or already generous toward Curtiss-Wright's potential? If you want to move quickly from headlines to hard evidence, take a closer look at the 2 key rewards.

Looking for more investment ideas?

If Curtiss-Wright has you rethinking your portfolio, this is the moment to widen your search and line up a few fresh candidates worth tracking.

• Target potential mispricings by scanning 46 high quality undervalued stocks that combine quality fundamentals with market skepticism that may not last.
• Strengthen your income stream by reviewing 8 dividend fortresses that aim to pair higher yields with stability.
• Prioritize resilience by focusing on 67 resilient stocks with low risk scores that score well on financial health and volatility.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.