Traeger (COOK) Turns Quarterly Profit With US$1.08 EPS Challenging Loss‑Focused Narratives

Traeger

Traeger

COOK

0.00

Traeger (COOK) opened Q1 2026 with revenue of US$94.1 million and basic EPS of US$1.08, alongside net income from ongoing operations of US$2.9 million, setting a clear marker against a trailing twelve month loss profile. Over the past year, the company has seen revenue across reported periods range from US$94.1 million to US$168.6 million. Over the same span, basic EPS has moved between a loss of US$33.46 and a gain of US$1.08, highlighting the volatility in earnings. For investors, a key consideration is whether these margins can be maintained or improved, given the recent shift from losses to a quarterly profit.

See our full analysis for Traeger.

With the latest figures now reported, an important next step is to compare these margins and EPS trends with the prevailing market narratives around Traeger, in order to see which perspectives align with the data and which may appear stretched.

NYSE:COOK Revenue & Expenses Breakdown as at May 2026
NYSE:COOK Revenue & Expenses Breakdown as at May 2026

Profit swings against a still loss‑making year

  • Q1 2026 showed net income from ongoing operations of US$2.9 million and basic EPS of US$1.08, while the latest trailing twelve month figures still show a loss of US$111.5 million and basic EPS of US$41.38 in losses.
  • Bulls argue that cost actions like Project Gravity and channel changes can turn one profitable quarter into a more consistent earnings story. However, the trailing twelve month loss and modest 1.9% annual revenue growth assumption in the bullish case mean a lot has to go right for margins to shift from about an 18% loss to a 4.4% profit margin.
    • The bullish view expects earnings to move from a loss of US$104.9 million to US$27.1 million by around 2029, which contrasts with the current trailing twelve month net loss of US$111.5 million.
    • Supporters also point to Project Gravity’s targeted US$50 million run rate cost saving by the end of 2026. At the same time, current revenue over the trailing twelve months of US$510.3 million shows the business is still sized against a loss making base today.
Bulls see Q1 as a turning point worth watching closely, especially with Project Gravity and grill mix changes now flowing into the numbers, and the full bullish narrative sets out how those moves might support earnings over several years. 🐂 Traeger Bull Case

Cheap 0.2x P/S, but profitability still a work in progress

  • The stock is referenced on a P/S of about 0.2x versus roughly 0.6x for peers and industry, while the supplied DCF fair value of US$296.23 sits far above both the current share price of US$41.34 and an allowed analyst price target reference of US$42.21.
  • Bears highlight that even with this low P/S and high DCF fair value, the company is not expected to be profitable within the next three years in the supplied signals. As a result, any valuation gap depends on losses narrowing from the current trailing twelve month level of US$111.5 million without clear near term earnings support.
    • The bearish narrative also works off an assumed move from roughly an 18% loss margin today to a 4.6% profit margin within a few years, which still requires a swing of more than 20 percentage points from the loss making trailing twelve month base.
    • On top of that, bears point to recent share price volatility over the last three months. This means even if the P/S discount closes, the path for the stock price could be bumpy compared with the relatively modest 1.3% to 1.9% annual revenue growth embedded in analyst assumptions.
Skeptics see a low P/S and high DCF fair value as only half the story, and drill into how ongoing losses and revenue mix changes could limit how much of that gap actually closes. 🐻 Traeger Bear Case

Revenue reset and grill mix under tariff pressure

  • Quarterly revenue over the last six reported periods has ranged between US$94.1 million and US$168.6 million, while the latest trailing twelve month revenue of US$510.3 million sits below the US$602.4 million level shown a year earlier in the data, and forward looking references call out modest 1.3% to 1.9% annual revenue growth against an 11.6% US market forecast.
  • Consensus narrative leans on cost savings and channel optimisation to support margins even on a smaller top line. Yet the grill market is described as slightly down, management is walking away from about US$60 million of revenue tied to channel exits, and tariff costs of around US$60 million exposure are only expected to be about 80% offset, which leaves plenty of room for actual revenue and gross margin trends to differ from the analysts’ 4% margin target.

Next Steps

To see how these results tie into long-term growth, risks, and valuation, check out the full range of community narratives for Traeger on Simply Wall St. Add the company to your watchlist or portfolio so you'll be alerted when the story evolves.

With bulls and bears both making strong cases, it helps to move quickly from opinions to numbers and test the story yourself. To weigh how those risks and rewards balance out before sentiment shifts again, take a closer look at the 2 key rewards and 2 important warning signs.

Explore Alternatives

Traeger is still working through a trailing twelve month loss of US$111.5 million, with profitability reliant on cost cuts and modest revenue growth assumptions.

If that mix of ongoing losses and execution risk feels uncomfortable, you can quickly focus on companies with healthier fundamentals using the solid balance sheet and fundamentals stocks screener (46 results).

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.